The African Great Green Wall project

What advice can scientists provide?

gmv

The pan-African Great Green Wall (GGW) is an initiative that was initially meant to involve the planting of a 15 km wide transcontinental forest belt running from Dakar to Djibouti. This major project is designed to combat desertification. The band of vegetation is to be as continuous as possible, but it may be rerouted if necessary to skirt around obstacles (streams, rocky areas, mountains) or to link inhabited areas (see. grandemurailleverte.org).

Scientists have and are still being queried by people, NGOs and donors on the merits and feasibility of this project. Members of CSFD are drawing up a summary of scientific findings to help answer these questions. Members of CSFD have been drawing up a summary of scientific findings to help answer these questions, published online (French) in October 2011. The English version of this review has been published in December 2012. 

This fact sheet summarizes the key points. Three misconceptions should be clarified before being able to shed light on the issue and provide useful advice.

Misconception n°1: The desert is a disease

village

The Sahara is sometimes considered as a kind of disease that spreads into surrounding areas. However, this desert is actually a healthy and precious ecosystem that, like other deserts worldwide, contributes to the Earth’s diversity and wealth. It is not in any way the image of an unhealthy environment. Global warming has modified its extension pattern in the past, and current climatic changes could lead to a gradual shift in some of the desert boundaries.

Misconception n°2: The Sahel is being invaded by a sand sea

Some people think that a gradually advancing sea of Saharan sand dunes is relentlessly invading the Sahel, but this is not the pattern that scientists have noted. Sand has been shifting in some areas, but these are local manageable phenomena and, moreover, the sand does not always move in a southward direction. Hence, this is not a continent-wide movement trend that should be halted like an invader.

The Sahara is thus a stable desert ecosystem, whereas the Sahel is affected by desertification. Desertification is not induced by the invasion of sand from the desert, instead it is a unique form of land degradation that occurs in these dryland regions, where rain does fall, but irregularly and with low total volumes (100–600 mm of rain per year).

Population concentration and the development of often ill-adapted agrosilvopastoral activities are the main factors underlying the desertification process. Renewable natural resources are then overtapped, without leaving sufficient time for these resources to be regenerated, while land degradation is exacerbated by drought.

Misconception n°3: A great forest wall could be planted in uninhabited or sparsely inhabited regions

rna

On the contrary, the proposed trajectory is to pass through inhabited regions where agriculture and livestock farming are already fully developed on lands allocated according to local traditions. Local inhabitants should thus be associated with any initiatives designed to combat desertification via tree planting.

In its current design, GGW is much more than its name or its trajectory suggest—the note in which its concept is presented (AU, CENSAD, Senegal 2008) states that the aim is to ensure the planting and integrated development of economically interesting drought-tolerant plant species, water retention ponds, agricultural production systems and other income-generating activities, as well as basic social infrastructures.

Planting trees in dryland regions to combat desertification is not a new idea. Some of the most famous large-scale projects include the Algerian Green Dam project which, as indicated in published reports and findings, met with some success but also quite a few failures, resulting in major project changes. The Great Green Wall of China has not been designed as a dam but instead it is a gigantic integrated management project to combat desertification in an area of over 4000 km long and 1000 km wide. This involves a combination of forest and shrub plantations, grassy vegetation cover in farming systems.

Many local initiatives and reforestation and agroforestry experiments have been carried out in the Sahel. The multiple uses of different tree species and the benefits for the inhabitants of this region are widely acknowledged. However, the results of many projects have not been formally disseminated, despite the fact that access to this mine of information, including the errors that should hereon be avoided, should be made accessible so that field managers and stakeholders will know what initiatives could or not work.

Research is still supported by available knowledge and is progressing. Hence, a recent conference in Dakar (2010) highlighted the merits of research for enhancing the efficiency of atmospheric nitrogen fixation by trees that have developed a symbiotic relationship with bacteria or fungi on their roots, thus facilitating the colonization of low fertility soils.

There are also many interesting results on vegetative reproduction techniques and assisted natural regeneration, which are easy, even for resource-poor farmers, to carry out.

Beyond these important technical aspects, success considerably depends on the social setting in which these plant propagation and tree planting projects are conducted. The delegation of responsibilities, rights on planted trees, access to products from these trees, management and local arbitration conditions and their integration in prevailing agropastoral systems are crucial. Projects in which trees were planted without the participation of local inhabitants were almost always limited and nonsustainable. When farmers’ rights and what they could hope to get back from their labour remain uncertain, technical efforts to select the best species, to enable them to develop properly in modern nurseries using advanced planting techniques, could generate some good results, but only in the short term.

An economic analysis has shown that assisted natural regeneration, which requires little investment, is the most cost-effective for resource-poor farmers. However, more intensive collective initiatives have a more clearcut impact when the timeframe is long.

Projects will therefore be more successful when designed for long-term application and within a more global sustainable land management framework. Tree planting, propagation and regeneration are actually part and parcel of other agrosilvopastoral family farming activities whereby trees are grown to generate fuel, fodder, resins and gum, building materials and medicinal products.

Recommandations for decisionmakers

The following recommendations are based on the analysis of agrosilvopastoral management results:

  1. Adopt a flexible approach in order to make effective use of the best sustainable land management practices,while taking the results of many completed green belt, plantation and agroforestry projects, and local know-how, into account
  2. Identify and boost farmers’ awareness on the most effective regeneration techniques, that are easy to manage (technically and financially) and cost-effective
  3. Rely on the decentralization process by ensuring the participation of inhabitants in planting the GGW and highlighting the potential benefits for them (improved land fertility, yields and the diversification of income-generating activities):
    • promote very simple village structures such as rural markets, etc
    • reinforce management training for members of village structures, including women
    • set up a suitable institutional framework for fiscal and land planning, while ensuring decentralization in order to strengthen local resource management, planning and development control capacities
  4. Foster agricultural and livestock farming intensification, so as to reduce pressure on forest resources.

All of these recommendations are geared towards the integration of tree planting and regeneration in a global sustainable land management framework.

    Escadafal Richard

    Escadafal Richard

    Chair of CSFD. Senior scientist IRD at CESBIO, Toulouse (France)

    Bellefontaine Ronald

    Bellefontaine Ronald

    Senior scientist at CIRAD – AGAP (Montpelleir, France)

    Bernoux Martial

    Bernoux Martial

    IRD soil scientist at Eco&Sols (Montpellier, France)

    Bonnet Bernard

    Bonnet Bernard

    Livestock Scientist, IRAM (France)

    Cornet Antoine

    Cornet Antoine

    Senior scientist, IRD (France)

    Cudennec Christophe

    Cudennec Christophe

    Professor of hydrology at Agrocampus Ouest, Rennes (France)

    D'Aquino Patrick

    D'Aquino Patrick

    Senior scientist CIRAD at ISRA, Dakar (Senegal)

    Droy Isabelle

    Droy Isabelle

    Socio-Economist, researcher at IRD (UMI Resiliences, France)

    Jauffret Sandrine

    Jauffret Sandrine

    Ecological Consultant (France)

    Leroy Maya

    Leroy Maya

    Reacher's/researcher, AgroParisTech (France)

    Mainguet Monique

    Mainguet Monique

    Geomorphologist (France)

    Malagnoux Michel

    Malagnoux Michel

    Forestry Specialist : Arid and Semi-arid Zones

    Requier-Desjardins Mélanie

    Requier-Desjardins Mélanie

    Trainer and researcher, social sciences, IAMM-CIHEAM


    Le projet africain de Grande Muraille Verte

    Fiche d'actualité du CSFD 2011

    Le projet africain de Grande Muraille Verte

    Quels conseils les scientifiques peuvent-ils apporter ?

Contact

CSFD
Comité Scientifique Français de la Désertification
Agropolis International
1000 avenue Agropolis
F-34394 Montpellier CEDEX 5 •  France
Tel.: +33 (0)4 67 04 75 44 • email: csfd@agropolis.fr




Comité Scientifique Français de la Désertification

CSFD
Agropolis International
1000 avenue Agropolis
F-34394 Montpellier CEDEX 5 •  France
Tel.: +33 (0)4 67 04 75 44 • email: csfd@agropolis.fr

Log in

Log in


Website: Olivier Piau (Agropolis Productions)
© 2013 Comité Scientifique Français de la Désertification (CSFD)